Skip to content

docs: fix typo definately -> definitely in README - #327

Closed
kamalesh404 wants to merge 1 commit into
zachlatta:mainfrom
kamalesh404:docs/fix-definately-typo
Closed

kamalesh404 wants to merge 1 commit into
zachlatta:mainfrom
kamalesh404:docs/fix-definately-typo

Conversation

@kamalesh404

@kamalesh404 kamalesh404 commented Sep 13, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fixes typo in README example block:

  • definately -> definitely`n
    Docs-only.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Corrected a spelling error in the README’s “Custom Cleanup” example.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 13, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change StackReview Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: e729e0c9-5103-47a0-88d0-8e59c3e1ce5b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ad5c827 and 1493cfe.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 8 included reviews per hour; 7 remain after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The README custom cleanup example corrects the spelling of “definately” to “definitely”.

Changes

README documentation

Layer / File(s) Summary
Correct example transcription
README.md
The RAW_TRANSCRIPTION example replaces “definately” with “definitely”.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Change: Other · Severity of issue fixed: Low

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 1493c

This documentation-only correction is safe to merge.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description states the change but omits the required Summary, Why, Verification, Risk and privacy, and Screenshots sections from the template. Complete the required sections. Document verification results, explain why no tests are needed for this documentation-only change, record risk and privacy impact, and state that screenshots are not required.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly identifies the README typo correction and matches the documented change.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
  • Fix all pre-merge checks with AI
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@kamalesh404
kamalesh404 deleted the docs/fix-definately-typo branch September 13, 2026 09:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant