Repository navigation
Set navigation conditions potentially changed when setting cookie - #302
llannasatoll wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
|
This feature seems to apply to all cookies, not just the Cookie Store API. It probably makes sense to update the spec in one place where the cookie storage model is invoked. @annevk I think this type of thing belongs in Fetch when we move more of the cookie spec into that. The flag in this feature would be a side effect of Cookie Store API calling methods in the Fetch spec, since I do not see a reason this API needs to be aware of this flag. WDYT? |
|
I think it's just cookie APIs (so this and |
|
I'm sorry for the long delay. I now have updated the PR to invoke the new |
DCtheTall
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
lgtm, thanks for your contribution and apologies for the delay myself 😄
7976d20 to
bcf1b58
Compare
This PR updates the spec to invoke the
mark navigation conditions as potentially changedabstract operation introduced in whatwg/html#11765 upon client-side cookie (document.cookieand CookieStore) modifications.(See WHATWG Working Mode: Changes for more details.)
💥 Error: 422 Unprocessable Entity 💥
PR Preview failed to build. (Last tried on Oct 20, 2026, 12:52 PM UTC).
More
PR Preview relies on a number of web services to run. There seems to be an issue with the following one:
🚨 Spec Generator - Spec Generator is the web service used to build bikeshed/ReSpec specs
🔗 Related URL
Error output:
[ { "lineNum": "658:45", "messageType": "link", "text": "No 'dfn' refs found for 'mark navigation conditions as potentially changed'." }, { "lineNum": null, "messageType": "failure", "text": "Did not generate, due to errors exceeding the allowed error level." } ]This seems to be an issue with the Spec Generator service. PR Preview doesn't manage this service and so has no control over it. If you've identified an issue with it, you can report the issue to the maintainers of Spec Generator directly. Please be courteous. Thank you!
If you don't have enough information above to solve the error by yourself or if the issue doesn't seem related to Spec Generator, you can file an issue with PR Preview.