fix: preserve unresolved protocol imports in vite analysis

[tmm]

Zyzz rejected server-only protocol imports before TanStack Start could remove them from client code. Unresolved protocols now stay runtime-only, while resolvable aliases remain analyzable and missing ordinary files and packages still fail.

For example, import { env } from "cloudflare:workers" used only inside createIsomorphicFn().server(...) no longer needs a dynamic-import workaround. Includes a patch changeset written in past tense.

Validation: the regression failed before the fix. All 60 Vite integration tests passed with V8 coverage (94.58% Vite plugin line coverage), plus scoped type checks, formatting/lint, and diff checks. The full type check exceeded orb memory limits. An initial concurrent suite run had three timeouts, and the unchanged suite passed sequentially.

[github-actions]

⚠️ Coverage report too large to inline, see the workflow summary.

[pkg-pr-new]

Open in StackBlitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/zyzz@464

commit: 5352257

[github-actions]

Examples

Example	URL	Status
api-react	Open	✅ Deployed
cli-react	Open	✅ Deployed
vite-react	Open	✅ Deployed
vite-solid	Open	✅ Deployed
vite-svelte	Open	✅ Deployed

[github-actions]

Site preview

Open preview

Commit: 53522579e04161fba1e1a4b4dda833c3e9183210

[github-actions]

Benchmark Report

🟢 Zyzz passes the framework gate in all 11 workloads.

Every workload compiles from fresh compiler state, including Lightning CSS minification and esbuild client bundling. Lower is better, bold marks the best result in each row, and the ratio beside each competitor compares its result with Zyzz.

Compile Time

Mean milliseconds per compilation.

Workload	Zyzz	Panda CSS	StyleX	Tailwind	Tamagui	vanilla-extract	Zyzz vs. Best Competitor
3 Components	1.16	40.46 (34.79×)	3.00 (2.58×)	2.47 (2.12×)	4.96 (4.26×)	5.86 (5.04×)	🟢 2.12× faster than Tailwind
1,000 Components: Repeated Styles	3.82	69.98 (18.33×)	234.73 (61.49×)	6.81 (1.78×)	314.67 (82.43×)	58.66 (15.37×)	🟢 1.78× faster than Tailwind
1,000 Components: Unique Padding	6.78	73.17 (10.79×)	230.17 (33.95×)	13.07 (1.93×)	339.06 (50.01×)	57.20 (8.44×)	🟢 1.93× faster than Tailwind
100 Components: Partial Sharing	1.90	40.33 (21.22×)	23.33 (12.28×)	4.92 (2.59×)	23.48 (12.36×)	10.63 (5.59×)	🟢 2.59× faster than Tailwind
100 Components: Reused Palette	1.54	42.48 (27.67×)	22.10 (14.39×)	3.26 (2.13×)	22.46 (14.63×)	10.57 (6.89×)	🟢 2.13× faster than Tailwind
100 Components: Independent Values	2.15	41.21 (19.17×)	25.10 (11.68×)	5.64 (2.63×)	28.75 (13.38×)	11.96 (5.56×)	🟢 2.63× faster than Tailwind
100 Components: Sparse Properties	1.72	38.80 (22.58×)	16.58 (9.64×)	3.82 (2.22×)	16.13 (9.39×)	9.20 (5.35×)	🟢 2.22× faster than Tailwind
60 Components: Mixed Shapes	1.45	38.52 (26.55×)	16.49 (11.36×)	2.47 (1.70×)	17.96 (12.38×)	9.14 (6.30×)	🟢 1.70× faster than Tailwind
300 Components: Application Scale	3.75	44.87 (11.97×)	53.42 (14.25×)	4.90 (1.31×)	56.86 (15.17×)	19.30 (5.15×)	🟢 1.31× faster than Tailwind
Themes: 10 Components	1.41	40.43 (28.76×)	21.55 (15.33×)	2.55 (1.81×)	16.13 (11.47×)	6.60 (4.69×)	🟢 1.81× faster than Tailwind
Themes: 100 Components	2.15	40.48 (18.84×)	121.60 (56.58×)	3.16 (1.47×)	30.00 (13.96×)	9.58 (4.46×)	🟢 1.47× faster than Tailwind

CSS Size

Gzip bytes of the minified stylesheet.

Workload	Zyzz	Panda CSS	StyleX	Tailwind	Tamagui	vanilla-extract	Zyzz vs. Best Competitor
3 Components	111	266 (2.40×)	181 (1.63×)	219 (1.97×)	169 (1.52×)	121 (1.09×)	🟢 10 B smaller than vanilla-extract
1,000 Components: Repeated Styles	111	266 (2.40×)	181 (1.63×)	219 (1.97×)	169 (1.52×)	2,094 (18.86×)	🟢 58 B smaller than Tamagui
1,000 Components: Unique Padding	4,615	4,647 (1.01×)	7,806 (1.69×)	5,026 (1.09×)	6,381 (1.38×)	5,640 (1.22×)	🟢 32 B smaller than Panda CSS
100 Components: Partial Sharing	1,161	1,491 (1.28×)	2,119 (1.83×)	1,555 (1.34×)	1,985 (1.71×)	1,218 (1.05×)	🟢 57 B smaller than vanilla-extract
100 Components: Reused Palette	244	439 (1.80×)	451 (1.85×)	410 (1.68×)	418 (1.71×)	647 (2.65×)	🟢 166 B smaller than Tailwind
100 Components: Independent Values	2,245	3,079 (1.37×)	4,375 (1.95×)	3,315 (1.48×)	4,698 (2.09×)	2,281 (1.02×)	🟢 36 B smaller than vanilla-extract
100 Components: Sparse Properties	850	964 (1.13×)	1,278 (1.50×)	984 (1.16×)	1,208 (1.42×)	964 (1.13×)	🟢 114 B smaller than Panda CSS
60 Components: Mixed Shapes	284	455 (1.60×)	407 (1.43×)	406 (1.43×)	425 (1.50×)	449 (1.58×)	🟢 122 B smaller than Tailwind
300 Components: Application Scale	915	1,077 (1.18×)	1,321 (1.44×)	1,065 (1.16×)	1,493 (1.63×)	3,098 (3.39×)	🟢 150 B smaller than Tailwind
Themes: 10 Components	201	372 (1.85×)	319 (1.59×)	298 (1.48×)	323 (1.61×)	203 (1.01×)	🟢 2 B smaller than vanilla-extract
Themes: 100 Components	574	739 (1.29×)	1,064 (1.85×)	686 (1.20×)	886 (1.54×)	640 (1.11×)	🟢 66 B smaller than vanilla-extract

JS Size

Gzip bytes of the bundled client JavaScript, including required runtime helpers.

Workload	Zyzz	Panda CSS	StyleX	Tailwind	Tamagui	vanilla-extract	Zyzz vs. Best Competitor
3 Components	322	374 (1.16×)	375 (1.16×)	404 (1.25×)	750 (2.33×)	335 (1.04×)	🟢 13 B smaller than vanilla-extract
1,000 Components: Repeated Styles	368	733 (1.99×)	663 (1.80×)	1,057 (2.87×)	1,266 (3.44×)	2,449 (6.65×)	🟢 295 B smaller than StyleX
1,000 Components: Unique Padding	2,721	3,339 (1.23×)	6,204 (2.28×)	3,508 (1.29×)	6,043 (2.22×)	2,449 (0.90×)	🔴 272 B larger than vanilla-extract
100 Components: Partial Sharing	568	1,243 (2.19×)	1,772 (3.12×)	1,316 (2.32×)	2,108 (3.71×)	558 (0.98×)	🔴 10 B larger than vanilla-extract
100 Components: Reused Palette	389	548 (1.41×)	628 (1.61×)	629 (1.62×)	1,075 (2.76×)	558 (1.43×)	🟢 159 B smaller than Panda CSS
100 Components: Independent Values	568	2,422 (4.26×)	2,861 (5.04×)	2,621 (4.61×)	3,355 (5.91×)	559 (0.98×)	🔴 9 B larger than vanilla-extract
100 Components: Sparse Properties	580	1,000 (1.72×)	1,118 (1.93×)	1,067 (1.84×)	1,682 (2.90×)	559 (0.96×)	🔴 21 B larger than vanilla-extract
60 Components: Mixed Shapes	371	532 (1.43×)	542 (1.46×)	611 (1.65×)	1,003 (2.70×)	468 (1.26×)	🟢 97 B smaller than vanilla-extract
300 Components: Application Scale	2,170	2,456 (1.13×)	2,651 (1.22×)	2,801 (1.29×)	3,492 (1.61×)	988 (0.46×)	🔴 1,182 B larger than vanilla-extract
Themes: 10 Components	390	418 (1.07×)	461 (1.18×)	413 (1.06×)	820 (2.10×)	389 (1.00×)	🔴 1 B larger than vanilla-extract
Themes: 100 Components	604	667 (1.10×)	1,007 (1.67×)	661 (1.09×)	1,344 (2.23×)	596 (0.99×)	🔴 8 B larger than vanilla-extract

Notes

• Gate: Zyzz must beat every competitor on mean compile time and on total gzip size (CSS plus JS). The application workload gates size only.
• Zyzz lanes: Literal workloads start from validated definitions. The application workload transforms one authored module, including parsing. Theme workloads include token resolution.
• More results: The workflow run has error margins, sample counts, raw and Brotli sizes, baseline comparisons, and render timings.