Skip to content

8023814: Test java/awt/im/memoryleak/InputContextMemoryLeakTest.java fails#4539

Open
rm-gh-8 wants to merge 1 commit into
openjdk:masterfrom
rm-gh-8:JDK-8023814-V17
Open

8023814: Test java/awt/im/memoryleak/InputContextMemoryLeakTest.java fails#4539
rm-gh-8 wants to merge 1 commit into
openjdk:masterfrom
rm-gh-8:JDK-8023814-V17

Conversation

@rm-gh-8

@rm-gh-8 rm-gh-8 commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backporting JDK-8023814: Test java/awt/im/memoryleak/InputContextMemoryLeakTest.java fails.

This PR removes InputContextMemoryLeakTest from the ProblemList and fixes the test to properly dispose the frame.

For parity with Oracle JDK.

Ran related tests on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:

make test TEST=test/jdk/java/awt/im/memoryleak/InputContextMemoryLeakTest.java

Results:

macos-aarch64-specific-test.log
windows-x64-specific-test.log
linux-x64-specific-test.log
linux-aarch64-specific-test.log



Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8023814 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8023814: Test java/awt/im/memoryleak/InputContextMemoryLeakTest.java fails (Bug - P3 - Requested)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4539/head:pull/4539
$ git checkout pull/4539

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4539
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/4539/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4539

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4539

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/4539.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper

bridgekeeper Bot commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Welcome back rmesde! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk Bot changed the title Backport 42baaa3bb8f240c04e85598d971597ae87c355b6 8023814: Test java/awt/im/memoryleak/InputContextMemoryLeakTest.java fails Jun 24, 2026
@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk Bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required labels Jun 24, 2026
@rm-gh-8 rm-gh-8 marked this pull request as ready for review June 24, 2026 16:34
@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ @rm-gh-8 This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk Bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 24, 2026
@rm-gh-8

rm-gh-8 commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/approval request for backport of JDK-8023814: Test java/awt/im/memoryleak/InputContextMemoryLeakTest.java fails.

This is a test fix.

For parity with Oracle JDK.

@openjdk

openjdk Bot commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@rm-gh-8
8023814: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk Bot added the approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received label Jun 24, 2026
@mlbridge

mlbridge Bot commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Webrevs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required rfr Pull request is ready for review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant