chore(release): close out v0.43.0

[github-actions]

Complete the existing closeout for published v0.43.0: retain one empty 0.43.1 - Unreleased section and set the development version to v0.43.0-dev. Preserve the released changelog exactly.

Document the observed macOS 15 minimum for both published native archives, add the matching release verification check, and refresh the install guide's Docker version and Go toolchain patch. Both downloaded Mac binaries report minos 15.0; their Developer ID signatures and online notarization checks passed. All ten release downloads/checksums and the release notes were verified, as were all four Homebrew hashes, the public Go proxy, and a synthetic offline CLI smoke test.

Validation: independent review through P2 and full make ci on AWS Crabbox. Exact-head cross-platform CI must pass before merge.

[clawsweeper]

🦞👀
ClawSweeper picked this up.

Pull request received. I will update this pull request when review starts.

ClawSweeper review complete

ClawSweeper finished reviewing this revision. The review result is being finalized.

View the workflow run.

[clawsweeper]

Codex review: needs maintainer review before merge. Reviewed October 1, 2026, 12:24 AM ET / 04:24 UTC (Revision 2).

ClawSweeper review

What this changes

Opens the next Unreleased changelog section, restores the development version, and updates installation and release-verification guidance for v0.43.0.

Merge readiness

✅ Ready for maintainer review

The release closeout remains necessary on main. The prior development-version finding is resolved, the published changelog is preserved, and no new actionable defect was found.

Priority: P3
Reviewed head: 302f233bd15e3c9c356d15217be752f0058340db

Review scores

Measure	Result	What it means
Overall readiness	🐚 platinum hermit (4/6)	A focused, policy-consistent closeout that resolves the prior finding and has no remaining actionable defect.
Proof confidence	🌊 off-meta tidepool	Not applicable: The bot-authored closeout is exempt from ordinary contributor proof. Its production change is embedded version metadata used by CLI version resolution; the body’s reported artifact checks support documentation updates rather than proving new native behavior. No stored-data contract changes.
Patch quality	🐚 platinum hermit (4/6)	No actionable review findings were identified.

Verification

Check	Result	Evidence
Real behavior	Not applicable	Not applicable: The bot-authored closeout is exempt from ordinary contributor proof. Its production change is embedded version metadata used by CLI version resolution; the body’s reported artifact checks support documentation updates rather than proving new native behavior. No stored-data contract changes.
Evidence reviewed	7 items	Introduced changes: The pinned main-to-head diff changes five files, adds one empty Unreleased heading, preserves all released changelog content, and changes the embedded version to v0.43.0-dev. Prior finding resolved: The previous review requested the development-version update. The current head supplies it, matching the documented closeout requirement and existing next-release script. Version behavior and existing coverage: Version resolution prefers injected or module versions and otherwise uses embedded metadata. Existing tests cover the development-build fallback and injected-version precedence; the patch changes only the metadata value.
Findings	None	None.
Security	None	None.

How this fits together

GogCLI’s release closeout prepares source builds and documentation for development after a published release. Embedded version metadata feeds CLI version output, while installation guidance directs users to published binaries and containers.

flowchart TD
 A[Published release] --> B[Release closeout]
 B --> C[Next Unreleased section]
 B --> D[Development version metadata]
 D --> E[CLI version output]
 A --> F[Verified artifact requirements]
 F --> G[Installation and verification guidance]

Loading

Before merge

None.

Agent review details

Security

None.

Review metrics

None.

Technical review

Best possible solution:

Complete the documented post-release transition while keeping published release content immutable and installation guidance consistent with verified artifacts.

Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue?

Not applicable: this is release housekeeping; source inspection verifies the metadata transition and resolves the prior finding.

Is this the best way to solve the issue?

Yes: the patch follows the existing closeout procedure and updates documentation without changing release artifacts, build behavior, or stored user state.

AGENTS.md: found and applied where relevant.

Codex review notes: model internal, reasoning medium; reviewed against 3b5122f4c81c.

Labels

Label changes:

• add rating: 🐚 platinum hermit: Overall readiness is 🐚 platinum hermit; proof is 🌊 off-meta tidepool and patch quality is 🐚 platinum hermit.
• add status: 👀 ready for maintainer look: ClawSweeper has no concrete contributor-facing blocker left for this PR. Not applicable: The bot-authored closeout is exempt from ordinary contributor proof. Its production change is embedded version metadata used by CLI version resolution; the body’s reported artifact checks support documentation updates rather than proving new native behavior. No stored-data contract changes.
• remove rating: 🦐 gold shrimp: Current PR rating is rating: 🐚 platinum hermit, so this older rating label is no longer current.
• remove status: ⏳ waiting on author: Current PR status label is status: 👀 ready for maintainer look.

Label justifications:

• P3: This is a bounded release metadata and documentation closeout with no introduced runtime defect identified.
• rating: 🐚 platinum hermit: Overall readiness is 🐚 platinum hermit; proof is 🌊 off-meta tidepool and patch quality is 🐚 platinum hermit.
• status: 👀 ready for maintainer look: ClawSweeper has no concrete contributor-facing blocker left for this PR. Not applicable: The bot-authored closeout is exempt from ordinary contributor proof. Its production change is embedded version metadata used by CLI version resolution; the body’s reported artifact checks support documentation updates rather than proving new native behavior. No stored-data contract changes.

Evidence

What I checked:

• Introduced changes: The pinned main-to-head diff changes five files, adds one empty Unreleased heading, preserves all released changelog content, and changes the embedded version to v0.43.0-dev. (internal/cmd/VERSION:1, 302f233bd15e)
• Prior finding resolved: The previous review requested the development-version update. The current head supplies it, matching the documented closeout requirement and existing next-release script. (docs/RELEASING.md:67, 302f233bd15e)
• Version behavior and existing coverage: Version resolution prefers injected or module versions and otherwise uses embedded metadata. Existing tests cover the development-build fallback and injected-version precedence; the patch changes only the metadata value. (internal/cmd/version.go:25, 302f233bd15e)
• Current-main and release boundary: Pinned main still embeds v0.43.0 and is tagged v0.43.0; the GitHub release endpoint confirms publication at 2026-10-01T03:52:48Z. Publication does not implement this subsequent development closeout. (internal/cmd/VERSION:1, 3b5122f4c81c)
• Installation guidance: The Go 1.27.1 guidance matches go.mod and Dockerfile. The Docker example remains conditional on successful publication. The captured PR body reports minos 15.0 for both published Mac binaries and successful signing and notarization checks; the patch documents that existing artifact requirement without changing builds. (docs/install.md:123, 302f233bd15e)
• Release-area routing history: Current-main history records Peter Steinberger’s work on release preparation, installation guidance, and the unified release workflow. These are routing signals, not verified source-line introduction claims. (docs/RELEASING.md, 3b5122f4c81c)

Likely related people:

• Peter Steinberger: Suggested for follow-up; no historical authorship or introduction is verified. (role: unverified routing candidate; confidence: low)

Rating scale

Score	Internal tier	Crab rank	Meaning
6/6	S	🦀 challenger crab	Exceptional readiness
5/6	A	🦞 diamond lobster	Very strong readiness
4/6	B	🐚 platinum hermit	Good normal PR; ordinary maintainer review
3/6	C	🦐 gold shrimp	Useful, but confidence is limited
2/6	D	🦪 silver shellfish	Proof or implementation needs work
1/6	F	🧂 unranked krab	Not merge-ready
N/A	NA	🌊 off-meta tidepool	Rating does not apply

Overall follows the weaker of proof and patch quality.
Shiny media proof means a screenshot, video, or linked artifact directly shows the changed behavior. Runtime, network, CSP, and security claims still need visible diagnostics.

Workflow

• ClawSweeper keeps one durable marker-backed review comment per issue or PR.
• Re-runs edit this comment so the latest verdict, findings, and automation markers stay together instead of adding duplicate bot comments.
• A fresh review can be triggered by eligible @clawsweeper re-review comments, exact-item GitHub events, scheduled/background review runs, or manual workflow dispatch.
• PR/issue authors and users with repository write access can comment @clawsweeper re-review or @clawsweeper re-run on an open PR or issue to request a fresh review only.
• Maintainers can also comment @clawsweeper review to request a fresh review only.
• Fresh-review commands do not start repair, autofix, rebase, CI repair, or automerge.
• Maintainer-only repair and merge flows require explicit commands such as @clawsweeper autofix, @clawsweeper automerge, @clawsweeper fix ci, or @clawsweeper address review.
• Maintainers can comment @clawsweeper explain to ask for more context, or @clawsweeper stop to stop active automation.

History

Review history (1 earlier review cycle)

• reviewed 2026-10-01T03:57:57.795Z sha 6c3243f :: needs changes before merge. :: [P2] Restore the development version in the same closeout PR