Skip to content

Remove Reflect::Field::m_UIName #9

Description

@gorlak

We should not store a UI name separate from the field name. The field name doesn't need to be the same as the actual code name for the field, so the string literal passed into AddField should be the UI name, and there is only one name for a field. To handle cases where we want to rename a field to be more descriptive, we should add an aliasing system just like with types in the registry so that field queried with a legacy name still resolve.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions