Skip to content

Extend portId rules - #3270

Merged
vlopeziglesias merged 71 commits into
newrelic:mainfrom
faltimiras:alti/npm-topology
Sep 30, 2026
Merged

vlopeziglesias merged 71 commits into
newrelic:mainfrom
faltimiras:alti/npm-topology

Conversation

@faltimiras

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

After testing portId in a limited scope, expand its usage to have a more robust system

Checklist

  • I've read the guidelines and understand the acceptance criteria.
  • The value of the attribute marked as identifier will be unique and valid.
  • I've confirmed that my entity type wasn't already defined. If it is I'm providing an explanation above.
  • I've linked an ARB ticket & received approval from API Review Board in order to make these changes

faltimiras added 30 commits June 8, 2026 16:09

@entityBot entityBot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't think these changes require an API Review Board (ARB) review, so it is not required to merge this PR. Note that all API changes do require one: if you believe this PR needs an ARB review, please create the ticket and add the ARB:pending label. Reach #api-review-board in case of doubts.

@entityBot
entityBot requested a review from a team September 30, 2026 09:11
@vlopeziglesias
vlopeziglesias merged commit 951e7fc into newrelic:main Sep 30, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants