Skip to content

docs(evm-simulation): sync README API surface with exports#868

Open
Foulks-Plb wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
singapore
Open

docs(evm-simulation): sync README API surface with exports#868
Foulks-Plb wants to merge 3 commits into
mainfrom
singapore

Conversation

@Foulks-Plb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Motivation

The @morpho-org/evm-simulation README had drifted from the package's actual public surface: the "API surface" list omitted four exported types (AccountAssetChanges, AssetChange, SimulationCall, RawLog), and neither the overview nor the usage example mentioned assetChanges/calls, which are now core fields of SimulationResult.

Solution

Reorganized the API surface list into Config / Input / Result groups so it matches src/index.ts exactly, updated the overview to mention net per-account balance changes, and expanded the usage example to destructure all four result fields with a one-line description of each. Documentation-only change — no runtime source touched, so no changeset is required.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Foulks-Plb Foulks-Plb added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jul 10, 2026
@Foulks-Plb Foulks-Plb self-assigned this Jul 10, 2026
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Foulks-Plb Foulks-Plb marked this pull request as ready for review July 10, 2026 13:05
@Foulks-Plb Foulks-Plb requested a review from a team as a code owner July 10, 2026 13:05
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Foulks-Plb

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Devin Review: No Issues Found

Devin Review analyzed this PR and found no bugs or issues to report.

Open in Devin Review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff.

Reviewed commit: d0ed11468f

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant