fix TestCryptoObfuscationDefaultPoolSize

[buixor]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

@buixor: There are no 'kind' label on this PR. You need a 'kind' label to generate the release automatically.

• /kind feature
• /kind enhancement
• /kind refactoring
• /kind fix
• /kind chore
• /kind dependencies

Details

I am a bot created to help the crowdsecurity developers manage community feedback and contributions. You can check out my manifest file to understand my behavior and what I can do. If you want to use this for your project, you can check out the BirthdayResearch/oss-governance-bot repository.

[github-actions]

@buixor: There are no area labels on this PR. You can add as many areas as you see fit.

• /area agent
• /area local-api
• /area cscli
• /area appsec
• /area security
• /area configuration

Details

I am a bot created to help the crowdsecurity developers manage community feedback and contributions. You can check out my manifest file to understand my behavior and what I can do. If you want to use this for your project, you can check out the BirthdayResearch/oss-governance-bot repository.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This pull request fixes a flaky unit test in the appsec challenge “dynamic module” obfuscation pool logic by avoiding reliance on the wall-clock epoch during runtime construction (which can cross a rotation boundary while obfuscation runs).

Changes:

• Update TestCryptoObfuscationDefaultPoolSize to assert against the contents of dynamicModuleCache rather than re-reading the current epoch from the keyring/clock.
• Ensure the cache lock is held safely across inspection via defer while validating cached epochs all contain exactly one variant.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[buixor]

/kind chore
/area appsec

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 63.77%. Comparing base (66ab61f) to head (432a1a5).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4565      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   63.76%   63.77%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         507      507              
  Lines       38652    38652              
==========================================
+ Hits        24645    24649       +4     
+ Misses      11657    11648       -9     
- Partials     2350     2355       +5     

Flag	Coverage Δ
bats	41.66% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
unit-linux	40.11% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unit-windows	28.58% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.