Skip to content

code of conduct #1

Closed
Closed

Description

We should have one of these.

The js foundation has one https://js.foundation/community/code-of-conduct we could copy. I think it's also important that people understand the concepts and reasons.

Thoughts?

Activity

  1. calvinmetcalf commented on Aug 29, 2017

    @calvinmetcalf

    node, babel and angular all have one based on the Contributor Covenant v1 so that might be a good one to consider

  2. ashaffer commented on Aug 29, 2017

    @ashaffer
    Member

    Personally i'm a fan of simplicity in these sorts of things. Complex rules have a way of growing ever more complex and taking on perverse meanings as people lobby and lawyer them. Something as simple as 'Be civil and inclusive'. Or even Postel's maxim, 'Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send' applied to discourse.

    I think generally anything more complex than 'be civil and inclusive' tends to be more about the author's desire to write a manifesto than it is about actual governance.

    EDIT: I should add I didn't intend that last line to be insulting. I love writing manifestos as much as the next person :p and would be happy to engage in it here. It's just that if the actual goal is governance of the projects, it may not be all that useful to do so.

  3. jprichardson commented on Aug 29, 2017

    @jprichardson
    Member

    @substack just pick one that you like and I'm sure the rest will accept. The most important thing here is just making decisions and moving quickly, we can always change these things later. As far as I'm concerned and I'm sure most others, you're the BDFL here unless you choose someone else.

    By the way, I'm glad to see you've chosen to go the org route :)

  4. ashaffer commented on Aug 29, 2017

    @ashaffer
    Member

    Ah, ya, I had written my comment before reading it. I like the text of the contributor covenant. I think that strikes the right balance of simplicity and specificity.

  5. ghost closed this as completedon Aug 29, 2017
  6. locked and limited conversation to collaborators on Nov 21, 2023
  7. converted this issue into a discussion #15 on Nov 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions