You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Personally i'm a fan of simplicity in these sorts of things. Complex rules have a way of growing ever more complex and taking on perverse meanings as people lobby and lawyer them. Something as simple as 'Be civil and inclusive'. Or even Postel's maxim, 'Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send' applied to discourse.
I think generally anything more complex than 'be civil and inclusive' tends to be more about the author's desire to write a manifesto than it is about actual governance.
EDIT: I should add I didn't intend that last line to be insulting. I love writing manifestos as much as the next person :p and would be happy to engage in it here. It's just that if the actual goal is governance of the projects, it may not be all that useful to do so.
@substack just pick one that you like and I'm sure the rest will accept. The most important thing here is just making decisions and moving quickly, we can always change these things later. As far as I'm concerned and I'm sure most others, you're the BDFL here unless you choose someone else.
By the way, I'm glad to see you've chosen to go the org route :)
Ah, ya, I had written my comment before reading it. I like the text of the contributor covenant. I think that strikes the right balance of simplicity and specificity.
Activity
calvinmetcalf commentedon Aug 29, 2017
node, babel and angular all have one based on the Contributor Covenant v1 so that might be a good one to consider
ashaffer commentedon Aug 29, 2017
Personally i'm a fan of simplicity in these sorts of things. Complex rules have a way of growing ever more complex and taking on perverse meanings as people lobby and lawyer them. Something as simple as 'Be civil and inclusive'. Or even Postel's maxim, 'Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send' applied to discourse.
I think generally anything more complex than 'be civil and inclusive' tends to be more about the author's desire to write a manifesto than it is about actual governance.
EDIT: I should add I didn't intend that last line to be insulting. I love writing manifestos as much as the next person :p and would be happy to engage in it here. It's just that if the actual goal is governance of the projects, it may not be all that useful to do so.
jprichardson commentedon Aug 29, 2017
@substack just pick one that you like and I'm sure the rest will accept. The most important thing here is just making decisions and moving quickly, we can always change these things later. As far as I'm concerned and I'm sure most others, you're the BDFL here unless you choose someone else.
By the way, I'm glad to see you've chosen to go the org route :)
ashaffer commentedon Aug 29, 2017
Ah, ya, I had written my comment before reading it. I like the text of the contributor covenant. I think that strikes the right balance of simplicity and specificity.