Skip to content

Improvement: Fix a TODO in concurrent_table.hpp #322

Description

@Reneg973

I tried to replace std::unordered_map with boost::concurrent_flat_map and saw a memory footprint I could not explain. It was easy to find this line:
using multimutex_type=multimutex<mutex_type,128>; // TODO: adapt 128 to the machine

Can this be fixed?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions