Skip to content

Route Server / other metadata support #4

Description

@compuzip

Do we want to eventually support route servers in any sort of "different" way? Realistically, peering with a route server isn't much different than peering with any other ASN, but having specific signaling could indicate something special to config generation logic that happens on the other end. @grizz points out next-hop-self - although now I'm wondering if any other metadata would be interesting. From a CDN perspective, "who you should expect to serve through here" could be useful, but that may even be useful in a non-RS case.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    future considerationsThings that we should track but are far enough away that we shouldn't worry too much about right now

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions