Skip to content

feat(vibenet): cover Cobalt 200ms blocks, migrate to current fork API… - #161

Open
soheimam wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
feat/vibeskill-200
Open

feat(vibenet): cover Cobalt 200ms blocks, migrate to current fork API…#161
soheimam wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
feat/vibeskill-200

Conversation

@soheimam

@soheimam soheimam commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

…, apply tip-jar field-test fixes

200ms blocks (live on vibenet,

Description

Type of change

  • Base MCP plugin submission
  • Update to an existing skill/plugin
  • [ X] New skill
  • Documentation
  • Other (please describe):

Affected skill(s)

NONE

Plugin checklist

  • Plugin spec/manifest is accurate and tested
  • (If Applicable) API endpoints and/or external MCP/CLI tested and functional
  • Follows Contribution Scope

Base MCP Plugin Submission Agreement (when applicable)

By checking the box below, I agree and represent on behalf of the protocol/entity it references that:

  • I am authorized to submit this plugin on behalf of the protocol/entity it references;

  • the plugin does not infringe or misappropriate any third party's rights;

  • the plugin and the underlying protocol comply with all applicable laws, and my API enforces the same geofencing and eligibility restrictions as my own user-facing app;

  • the plugin is in full compliance with our protocol's/entity's then-current terms and conditions, and if not, submission and use thereafter is considered a formal written exemption to such terms and conditions;

  • the plugin accurately describes its behavior and contains no hidden, deceptive, or malicious instructions, and my API will not return malicious or unexpected calldata;

  • the protocol/entity is solely responsible for the plugin and is submitting a plugin is subject to the Base Account and Base App Terms of Service as using a "Service"; and

  • Base may modify, decline to list, or remove the plugin at any time, for any reason.

  • [X ] I have read and agree to the Base MCP Plugin Submission Agreement above.

…, apply tip-jar field-test fixes

200ms blocks (live on vibenet, verified 2026-09-09):
- New references/200ms-blocks.md: timestampMs / blockTimestampMs, BaseTime
  deposit + predeploy, querying and streaming blocks (wss .../ws), viem
  polling defaults, timed EOA and 8130 sends, Flashblocks migration table.
- SKILL.md triggers, network table, routing and procedure updated.

Fork API drift (branch head, Aug-Sep 2026): sendCalls -> sendTransaction,
keystoreAddress replaces accountConfiguration params, actorScope.sender ->
operator, regenerated canonical addresses. All references migrated and the
create, sponsor and session-key flows re-run live against the new build.

Tip-jar field-test fixes (fix.md #1-#14): operator actor for the
PolicyManager, scope-bit table, binding reproducibility, getSessionSpend
signature, payer insolvency, wallet-wrapped sponsored value, salt
persistence, faucet 429 retry, chain-health semantics, gas-vs-value
wording, installer gitignore hygiene, stale gist annotation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016NCXKz9Re1SY5JTU3xMqg1
@cb-heimdall

cb-heimdall commented Sep 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

✅ Heimdall Review Status

Requirement Status More Info
Reviews 1/1
Denominator calculation
Show calculation
1 if user is bot 0
1 if user is external 0
2 if repo is sensitive 0
From .codeflow.yml 1
Additional review requirements
Show calculation
Max 0
0
From CODEOWNERS 0
Global minimum 0
Max 1
1
1 if commit is unverified 0
Sum 1

Comment thread skills/vibenet/SKILL.md Outdated
Review feedback on #161. The literal node error string
`rpc method is not whitelisted` is kept verbatim where quoted, since that
is what rpc.vibes.base.org actually returns.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016NCXKz9Re1SY5JTU3xMqg1
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants