Docs: README polish + badges, current-state sync#99
Conversation
- Badges: CI, benchmarks gate, Docker, release, dual license - Intro: benchmark results up front (44 vs 41 VDL2, 161 vs 162 Mode S); AIS-catcher and dump1090 added to the replaced-tools list - Mode table validation cells state the CI-fenced benchmark results - Install examples bumped 0.9.0 -> 0.14.0; stale legacy/ link removed (the tree was deleted in #84; history preserves it) - ARCHITECTURE.md status header reflects v0.14.0 + oracle parity; ASF2.md body list current Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 13 minutes and 10 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more credits in the billing tab to continue. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 7732a063ba
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| sudo apt install ./xng-0.14.0-arm64.deb # pulls runtime deps | ||
| # or | ||
| tar xzf xng-v0.9.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.gz && sudo cp xng-*/xng /usr/local/bin/ | ||
| tar xzf xng-v0.14.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.gz && sudo cp xng /usr/local/bin/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For the tarball install path, this now fails after extraction because the release workflow packages the binary under a versioned directory (PKG=xng-${GITHUB_REF_NAME}-${{ matrix.target }} and tar -C dist ... ${PKG} in .github/workflows/release.yml lines 44-47), not as ./xng at the current directory. Users following the README for Linux/macOS tarballs will get cp: cannot stat 'xng'; keep the previous xng-*/xng source or include the full extracted directory name.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
legacy/link removed (deleted in Remove the legacy pre-rewrite tree #84, preserved in history); ARCHITECTURE.md status header and ASF2.md body list brought to v0.14.0🤖 Generated with Claude Code