Skip to content

sssd man-page: Improve man-page for override_gid#8741

Merged
justin-stephenson merged 1 commit into
SSSD:masterfrom
asakure:man_page_override_gid
May 29, 2026
Merged

sssd man-page: Improve man-page for override_gid#8741
justin-stephenson merged 1 commit into
SSSD:masterfrom
asakure:man_page_override_gid

Conversation

@asakure
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@asakure asakure commented May 28, 2026

This commit improves the man-page statement for override_gid option by adding clear description & "Default" value.

Resolves: #7341

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the documentation for the override_gid configuration option in sssd.conf.5.xml to clarify its behavior and document its default value. The reviewer pointed out a grammatical inconsistency ("supersedes" instead of "supersede") and formatting issues involving mixed tabs and spaces, providing a suggestion to resolve both.

Comment thread src/man/sssd.conf.5.xml Outdated
Comment thread src/man/sssd.conf.5.xml Outdated
<listitem>
<para>
Override the primary GID value with the one specified.
Override the primary GID value for all users in this
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @asakure Do you think it is enough to say Override the primary GID value for all users with this value ?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@asakure asakure May 29, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @justin-stephenson Yes, it will keep it short. But I think we shall include domain part for example - Override the primary GID value for all users in the domain with specified value. Let me know your opinion.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, thanks

Comment thread src/man/sssd.conf.5.xml Outdated
the identity provider.
</para>
<para>
Default: not set (SSSD will use the primary GID value
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please remove SSSD will I don't think it is worthwhile

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ack, will do that.

@sssd-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The pull request was accepted by @justin-stephenson with the following PR CI status:


🟡 rpm-build:centos-stream-10-x86_64:upstream (in_progress)
🟡 rpm-build:fedora-43-x86_64:upstream (in_progress)
🟡 rpm-build:fedora-44-x86_64:upstream (in_progress)
🟡 rpm-build:fedora-rawhide-x86_64:upstream (in_progress)
🟡 Analyze (target) / cppcheck (in_progress)
➖ Coverity scan / coverity (skipped)


There are unsuccessful or unfinished checks. Make sure that the failures are not related to this pull request before merging.

Comment thread src/man/sssd.conf.5.xml Outdated
@asakure asakure force-pushed the man_page_override_gid branch 2 times, most recently from 96d1ec2 to 73210ac Compare May 29, 2026 18:40
@justin-stephenson justin-stephenson added Accepted Trivial A single reviewer is sufficient to review the Pull Request labels May 29, 2026
This commit improves the man-page statement for override_gid
option by adding clear description & "Default" value.

Resolves: SSSD#7341

Signed-off-by: Akshay Sakure <asakure@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Justin Stephenson <jstephen@redhat.com>
@sssd-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The pull request was accepted by @justin-stephenson with the following PR CI status:


🟢 osh-diff-scan:fedora-rawhide-x86_64:upstream (success)
🟢 rpm-build:centos-stream-10-x86_64:upstream (success)
🟢 rpm-build:fedora-43-x86_64:upstream (success)
🟢 rpm-build:fedora-44-x86_64:upstream (success)
🟢 rpm-build:fedora-rawhide-x86_64:upstream (success)
🟢 Analyze (target) / cppcheck (success)
🟡 Build / freebsd (in_progress)
🟡 Build / make-distcheck (in_progress)
🟡 ci / intgcheck (centos-10) (in_progress)
🟡 ci / intgcheck (fedora-43) (in_progress)
🟡 ci / intgcheck (fedora-44) (in_progress)
🟡 ci / intgcheck (fedora-45) (in_progress)
🟢 ci / prepare (success)
🟡 ci / system (centos-10) (in_progress)
🟡 ci / system (fedora-43) (in_progress)
🟡 ci / system (fedora-44) (in_progress)
🟡 ci / system (fedora-45) (in_progress)
➖ Coverity scan / coverity (skipped)
🟡 Static code analysis / codeql (in_progress)
🟢 Static code analysis / pre-commit (success)
🟡 Static code analysis / python-system-tests (in_progress)


There are unsuccessful or unfinished checks. Make sure that the failures are not related to this pull request before merging.

@sssd-bot sssd-bot force-pushed the man_page_override_gid branch from 73210ac to e0d7f7f Compare May 29, 2026 19:45
@justin-stephenson justin-stephenson merged commit 5b6c11d into SSSD:master May 29, 2026
15 of 16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Accepted backport-to-sssd-2-9 backport-to-sssd-2-13 Trivial A single reviewer is sufficient to review the Pull Request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

sssd.conf(5): override_gid: "Override the primary GID value with the one specified." Ambiguous wording, no mention of default

4 participants