Repository navigation
Expand “Under Consideration” description and add advanced tricks exception - #2531
Merged
Merged
Conversation
yep, no problem from me |
|
can this also extend to bugfixing for logic? |
Collaborator
Author
|
Bugfixes already get to skip the “Under Consideration” label, it only applies to enhancements. |
cjohnson57
approved these changes
Mar 6, 2026
|
ok |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds an exception to the requirement for “enhancement” (new feature) issues/PRs to go through the nomination process, allowing the maintainers of advanced logic to add tricks and glitches to it more easily.
I've also taken the opportunity to expand the description of the Under Consideration status label to clarify some questions and misconceptions I've seen, and to add a small note to the release cycle section letting people know about the pin in #dev-public-talk.
@dotzo @shirosoluna please confirm whether you're okay with your GitHub usernames being added to our documentation.