Repository navigation
docs(website): fix outdated website content - #1307
Merged
Merged
Conversation
github-actions
Bot
added
website
laurabelinfante
changed the title
Contributor
|
🚀 Website Preview Deployed! Preview your changes at: https://pr-1307-common-grants.agile6.workers.dev Built from commit d5b8934 |
github-actions
Bot
added
the
typescript
laurabelinfante
force-pushed
the
1306-website-content-fixes
branch
from
October 14, 2026 17:01
e8b4902 to
7139d51
Compare
karinamzalez
approved these changes
Oct 14, 2026
karinamzalez
left a comment
karinamzalez
left a comment
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approved with some clarifying questions!
- about.mdx:41 lists awards as done, while about.mdx:49 lists “Award support” as current work. Is the split meant to be “routes done, SDK and reference implementation in progress”?
- Has the RFC-0002 comment period at 0002.md:10 actually been closed on the Discourse forum too?
|
|
||
| import { CardGrid, LinkCard } from "@astrojs/starlight/components"; | ||
|
|
||
| :::tip[Looking to provide input?] |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are we intentionally dropping the link to the co-planning board ?
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The box we removed only pointed down to the Active RFCs list and didn’t actually link to the co-planning board. But you’re right that the page didn’t say where feedback goes now, so I added a note at the top that points to the co-planning board.
Collaborator
Author
|
laurabelinfante
force-pushed
the
1306-website-content-fixes
branch
from
October 14, 2026 17:30
8ec651c to
85b8aac
Compare
Update the About page roadmap, add a demo portal tile, point feedback links to the co-planning board, move RFC-0002 to past RFCs, and label the spec page as v0.5.0 instead of a draft. Fixes #1306 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
laurabelinfante
force-pushed
the
1306-website-content-fixes
branch
from
October 14, 2026 17:30
85b8aac to
d5b8934
Compare
10 tasks done
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Changes proposed
Updates outdated website content: the About page roadmap, a new demo portal tile on the About page, feedback links pointed to the co-planning board, RFC-0002 moved to past RFCs, and the spec page labeled as v0.5.0 instead of a draft.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code