Expand outreach to token-efficient agent tooling maintainers #197

Activity

1. coderabbitai commented on Nov 2, 2026

   

   coderabbitaiBot

   on Nov 2, 2026 – with coderabbitai

   More actions

   🔗 Related PRs

   #129 - Record activation evidence and confirmed heading-preservation defects [merged]

   ---

   📝 Issue Planner

   _{Check the box below or use the @coderabbitai plan command to generate an implementation plan and prompts that you can use with your favorite coding assistant.}

   • Create Plan

   ---

   🧪 Issue enrichment is currently in open beta.

   You can configure auto-planning by selecting labels in the issue_enrichment configuration.

   To disable automatic issue enrichment, add the following to your .coderabbit.yaml:

   issue_enrichment:
     auto_enrich:
       enabled: false

   💬 Have feedback or questions? Drop into our discord!
2. JonghunYu commented on Nov 2, 2026

   

   JonghunYu

   on Nov 2, 2026

   MemberAuthor

   More actions

   Expanded outreach batch — November 2, 2026

   User requested quantity over quality and explicitly expanded outreach. This supersedes the one-offer wait in #196 for this batch. Twelve candidates screened; ten proposals sent, seven issues and three discussions. Each current README and available contribution/issue routes inspected; all-state issue/PR search for Texio returned no matches before send. Recent discussion lists also checked for the three discussion routes. Search coverage is bounded, not proof against all historical discussion mentions.

   Published and verified

   • Supersynergy/agent-token-saver: Benchmark question: optional Texio for named Markdown tasks Supersynergy/agent-token-saver#1 — exact title/body verified: True; sent 2026-11-02T04:34:31.665710+00:00
   • ppgranger/token-saver: Feature suggestion: evaluate an optional Texio Markdown workflow recipe ppgranger/token-saver#76 — exact title/body verified: True; sent 2026-11-02T04:34:32.739068+00:00
   • Christopher-Schulze/Slimference: Evaluation idea: opt-in Texio recipe for explicit Markdown section tasks Christopher-Schulze/Slimference#2 — exact title/body verified: True; sent 2026-11-02T04:34:34.013784+00:00
   • pbi-agent/pbi-agent: Try an optional Markdown section skill with Texio and measure task tokens pbi-agent/pbi-agent#360 — exact title/body verified: True; sent 2026-11-02T04:34:35.228451+00:00
   • tradem/pi-ast-bro: Optional Texio comparison for named Markdown section updates tradem/pi-ast-bro#1 — exact title/body verified: True; sent 2026-11-02T04:34:36.366723+00:00
   • shanirsh/prismodev: Evaluation idea: verify whether Texio reduces Markdown-task token waste shanirsh/prismodev#2 — exact title/body verified: True; sent 2026-11-02T04:34:37.426328+00:00
   • formin/token-saver: Optional Texio workflow trial without adding unverified savings to the footer formin/token-saver#1 — exact title/body verified: True; sent 2026-11-02T04:34:38.850470+00:00
   • rtk-ai/rtk: Would an opt-in Texio recipe complement RTK on named Markdown tasks? rtk-ai/rtk#4946 — exact title/body verified: True; sent 2026-11-02T04:34:40.162388+00:00
   • hansipie/ecotokens: Optional Texio trial for Markdown section tasks alongside ecotokens hansipie/ecotokens#145 — exact title/body verified: True; sent 2026-11-02T04:34:41.432490+00:00
   • ooples/token-optimizer-mcp: Compare optional Texio section operations with current Markdown optimization ooples/token-optimizer-mcp#554 — exact title/body verified: True; sent 2026-11-02T04:34:42.496517+00:00

   Evidence and scope

   Each proposal gives a project-specific optional read/skill/measurement angle, discloses Texio maintainer affiliation, links installation, provides no-write commands, and requests a comparison against existing tools including total task tokens/cache effects/retries/correctness/setup overhead. No actual integration savings claimed. Outreach is not an accepted trial, activation or adoption. No implementation PR, paid agent run or repository file change. Existing Token Guard #12 is separate and was not contacted again.

   Two screened candidates held: microsoft/TokenEconomizer (less direct repository-learning/tool-pruning fit); mauriziofonte/toktoken (already a specialized retrieval backend; avoid another general pitch in this batch). pi-ast-bro already supports Markdown, explicitly acknowledged in its proposal.

   Continuation checkpoint

   Await substantive maintainer replies. Review at the first existing daily-monitor run on/after November 9, 2026; this is a bounded check time, not a promised response. Continue accepted scoped comparisons under existing authorization; record declines and no-responses without repeat nudges. Keep unchanged checks quiet. Preserve original campaign clocks. No branch/PR applies. Distinct implementation tasks need their own issue and normal review gates. Track actual external participation separately from these project-authored invitations.
3. JonghunYu commented on Nov 4, 2026

   

   JonghunYu

   on Nov 4, 2026

   MemberAuthor

   More actions

   Response audit 2026-11-04 under #202: all seven issues and three Discussions fetched. All remain open, with zero comments/replies. No accepted evaluation, trial or adoption evidenced. Retain Nov9 bounded response check; no repeat invitations.
4. JonghunYu commented on Nov 8, 2026

   

   JonghunYu

   on Nov 8, 2026

   MemberAuthor

   More actions

   Scheduled response audit November 9, 2026. Rechecked 41 GitHub proposals across #196, #197 and #200, including discussion replies. Token-Saver maintainer reported and documented a disposable-fixture Texio 0.1.3 evaluation. Verified docs/markdown-workflow.md on the default branch, merged PR ppgranger/token-saver#77 at bc058577e6e0c6581525f63e3bde963db4229130 (November5 19:25:06UTC), and releasev3.0.1 (19:26:06UTC). Published comparison reports combined command/stdout characters236 Token-Saver,224 targeted rg/sed,322 Texio. Scope is inspection on a small fixture, with preview-preservation and refusal checks. Record external fixture evaluation and merged optional documentation recipe. A recurring participant-owned task, whole-task model-token savings and repeat use remain unverified.

   Three previously recorded declines stand (Polaris, Token Harness, TokenEconomizer). The other37 proposals have no substantive response, including fak with its historical resolved format-bot comment. Pause unanswered offers after this scheduled check. Resume only on actual inbound acceptance under existing scoped authorization. No follow-up invitation needed.