Finding
PR #596 exposed a separate PR-size governance integrity class that is not owned by #510. The existing exception mechanism must not allow a governed pull request to become larger or less reviewable than the repository's absolute authority while it is in progress.
This issue owns the #596-class exception controls:
- an exception's governed semantic scope must not exceed the absolute tier;
- a governed PR must not self-expand or retroactively elevate its own exception;
- effective ceilings must be authorized from the base-side governance state;
- exception paths must remain inside an explicit allowlist;
- the embedded reason must be short and practical, with durable rationale referenced from an issue/doc/PR instead of an unbounded essay.
Relationship to #510
#510 owns the distinct write-scoped trust boundary where pr-size and workflow-policy execute enforcement/commenting code from PR-controlled checkout content. This issue does not duplicate that finding and does not choose its trusted-workflow architecture. The two controls are complementary and both remain required.
Required hardening
Add regression coverage for:
- files over the absolute ceiling → reject;
- commits over the absolute ceiling → reject;
- governed meaningful lines over the authorized exception ceiling → reject;
- self-expansion or retroactive exception elevation from the governed PR → reject;
- a changed path outside the exception allowlist → reject;
- a valid narrow, base-authorized exception → pass;
- an explicitly allowed supplemental generated/normative artifact → pass only under the narrow supplemental rule.
The implementation must preserve the ordinary absolute tier as the upper authority. It must not reopen or rewrite PR #596; use that PR as regression/postmortem evidence.
Scheduling gate
This is a prerequisite before:
- any new PR-size exception is relied upon; and
- R-15 implementation starts.
A small ordinary #553 PR that stays within the absolute tier may continue independently. If a future #553 slice needs an exception, this issue must be completed first.
Finding
PR #596 exposed a separate PR-size governance integrity class that is not owned by #510. The existing exception mechanism must not allow a governed pull request to become larger or less reviewable than the repository's absolute authority while it is in progress.
This issue owns the #596-class exception controls:
Relationship to #510
#510 owns the distinct write-scoped trust boundary where
pr-sizeandworkflow-policyexecute enforcement/commenting code from PR-controlled checkout content. This issue does not duplicate that finding and does not choose its trusted-workflow architecture. The two controls are complementary and both remain required.Required hardening
Add regression coverage for:
The implementation must preserve the ordinary absolute tier as the upper authority. It must not reopen or rewrite PR #596; use that PR as regression/postmortem evidence.
Scheduling gate
This is a prerequisite before:
A small ordinary #553 PR that stays within the absolute tier may continue independently. If a future #553 slice needs an exception, this issue must be completed first.