Repository navigation
Why did you start httpx2 instead of contributing to httpx? #1224
|
Your docs site states on the front page:
I agree that httpx lacks maintenance for some time now. I agree that anything that communicates via the internet needs security patches ASAP. I'm a happy user of httpx and applaud its continuation. I just don't understand why you started a new project when the normal way in open source would be to contribute to the existing project. This move is fragmenting the community (unnecessarily in my view). I'm missing the motivation for this move. |
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
|
I'm not @Kludex but I started httpxyz just a little prior to httpx2 existing, my reasons are here: https://tildeweb.nl/~michiel/httpxyz.html |
|
I don't think there's a need to expose more drama publicly. Pydantic forked httpx because the repo was closed for issues, PRs and discussions. The most downloaded packages already migrated to httpx2, so I don't think this is fragmenting, but actually consolidating. |
I don't think there's a need to expose more drama publicly.
Pydantic forked httpx because the repo was closed for issues, PRs and discussions.
The most downloaded packages already migrated to httpx2, so I don't think this is fragmenting, but actually consolidating.