Skip to content

[Feature Request / Contribution Proposal] working with internet drafts #112

Description

@beltram

Hi, and first of all thanks for the crate, it great, love it.

When working with internet drafts there are very often a lot of pending/requested IANA codepoints that are not within the private range and hence cannot be used within the ClaimSetBuilder which is a very convenient way to build a Cose object.

One have to resort to do the CBOR serialization by hand on the side to bypass this line.

My proposal is to add another variants like such:

pub enum RegisteredLabelWithPrivate<T: EnumI64 + WithPrivateRange> {
    PrivateUse(i64),
    InternetDraft(T),
    Assigned(T),
    Text(String),
}

#[derive(Clone, Debug, Eq, PartialEq)]
pub enum RegisteredLabel<T: EnumI64> {
    InternetDraft(T),
    Assigned(T),
    Text(String),
}

And an associated ClaimSetBuilder::internet_draft_claim that would let pass arbitrary labels.

What do you think ?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions