Not a bug report — builder-to-builder question about making one ag402 payment event inspectable after settlement.
Hi ag402 team,
I’m Andriy, running a small Norwegian system called SAGE that produces re-derivable receipts for agent and on-chain activity.
I noticed ag402 is focused on x402 payments for AI agents on Solana. The part I’m interested in is what happens after the payment: the on-chain settlement reference can be checked independently, while the submitted request and response can be packaged as a content-hashed, signed record that becomes tamper-evident after issuance.
I generated a receipt over one of my own on-chain settlements to show what this rail produces in practice. It is content-hashed and Ed25519-signed, and I can send the receipt JSON plus the public verifier command so you can re-run it yourself instead of taking my word for it. The interesting bit: change one recorded field, and re-derivation breaks. It does not judge whether the settlement was “right” — it shows attribution, ordering, integrity, and provenance around the event.
Would you be open to sharing one example ag402 event that you are comfortable making inspectable, so I can generate the same kind of receipt and send back the receipt JSON plus verifier steps?
No worries if this is not useful right now.
— Andriy
IFP Norge
Not a bug report — builder-to-builder question about making one ag402 payment event inspectable after settlement.
Hi ag402 team,
I’m Andriy, running a small Norwegian system called SAGE that produces re-derivable receipts for agent and on-chain activity.
I noticed ag402 is focused on x402 payments for AI agents on Solana. The part I’m interested in is what happens after the payment: the on-chain settlement reference can be checked independently, while the submitted request and response can be packaged as a content-hashed, signed record that becomes tamper-evident after issuance.
I generated a receipt over one of my own on-chain settlements to show what this rail produces in practice. It is content-hashed and Ed25519-signed, and I can send the receipt JSON plus the public verifier command so you can re-run it yourself instead of taking my word for it. The interesting bit: change one recorded field, and re-derivation breaks. It does not judge whether the settlement was “right” — it shows attribution, ordering, integrity, and provenance around the event.
Would you be open to sharing one example ag402 event that you are comfortable making inspectable, so I can generate the same kind of receipt and send back the receipt JSON plus verifier steps?
No worries if this is not useful right now.
— Andriy
IFP Norge